Articles

Essays and opinion pieces from our hosts and listeners involving American politics touching on current events, politics, history, and the like.

So How Are Things for the Democrats These Days?

by D.J. McGuire

The election results for the Democrats were good enough to flip the House on Election Night (and the Virginia delegation with it). The post-Election Night results were, if anything, even better. So as Republicans wallow in their defeats, my party should be riding high, yes?

No.

Don’t get me wrong; the fact that there will, at long last, be someoneready and willing to hold the president to account for his behaviors, actions, and policies are a boon not just to the Democratic Party but to the nation as a whole. While my position on the right side of the Democrats – I have referred to myself often as “the conservative feather of the Democratic Party” – leads me to usually recommend caution to the party, I have made no such recommendation regarding Congressional oversight and investigations. This Administration redefines “a surplus of targets” in that category.

That said, the election results have added evidence (and evidence-free yapping) to the arguments within the party about its direction – arguments that usually converge on two options: go left or go center.

I would submit the election evidence clearly points in the direction of the latter. The Democrats in House races that flipped the suburbs blue across the country were overwhelmingly moderate candidates. Likewise, the realignment of the Southwest – halting and painfully short in 2016 – came to fruition in 2018 with moderate candidates ready to take advantage of it (such as Senators-Elect Sinema and Rosen).

Meanwhile, the left’s favorites – Stacey Abrams, Andrew Gillum, and Beto O’Rourke – all lost, although Abrams was at least able to keep the state’s Chamber of Commerce neutral in the race, a sign she may be more practical than some of her most ardent supporters want her to be.

Still, the midterm results should make Democrats hopeful for 2020, yes?

No.

Over the last 60+ years, four first-term presidents saw one (or both) houses of Congress slip from their parties’ hands in midterm elections: Ike in 1954, Clinton in 1994, Obama in 2010, and now Trump in 2018. The first two increased their electoral vote totals in winning re-election (Obama dropped North Carolina and Indiana in 2012, but still won re-election).

In other words, Trump’s defeat in 2020 is far from guaranteed. The House Committees will likely uncover embarrassing and unethical activities – and just because I didn’t include the word “impeachable”  does not mean I’m ruling it out – but denying Trump re-election will rely on winning over once again those suburban swing voters who took the House majority away from his party.

Form my perspective, that means the Democrats have to recognize they need what I call “trade doves” (which just happens to include me) – supporters of freer trade and/or voters who don’t like trade wars. They were key in flipping Midwest agricultural districts (while industrial or ex-industrial ones stayed with the Trump-led, protectionist GOP).

My biggest fear is that, instead, the nominee in 2020 will try to out-protectionist Trump. That is impossible. As the Wall Street Journal noted today, protectionism is the one thing on which Trump has been consistent for over three decades. He really believes this stuff.

The problem for Trump is that millions of Americans are far smarter about this than he is. The problem for the Democrats is that those millions – while they now include a majority of Democratic voters– may not include a majority of Democratic elected officials.

Thus, we could have the nightmare of Elizabeth Warren or Sherrod Brown trying to beat their own trade warrior drums over the fall of 2020, turning off centrist and center-right swing voters in droves in the process. Even Hillary Clinton refused to defend freer trade and trade agreements against Trump’s rhetorical barrage in 2016 – and we know where that got her.

Democrats need to be smart about the next two years – and very careful with whom we nominate. The Republicans’ woes do not automatically translate to future wins for us.

D.J. McGuire – a self-described progressive conservative – has been part of the More Perfect Union Podcast since 2015. He is also a contributor to Bearing Drift.

Pop Goes The Political Culture, November 11

Mood board at MPU headquarters this week.

 

 

Welcome back MPU-inverse! I’m sure you all join me in offering thanks for the service of all of America’s veterans. We are grateful for you contributions to global peace and prosperity.

This was an incredible political week where Democrats surged to victory in the House, in multiple governor’s mansion, multiple state legislatures, and possibly in Jeff Flake’s Senate seat in Arizona. We don’t know yet; they’re still counting the votes. As of Thursday, my girl Kyrsten Sinema had edged ahead of Republican Martha McSally and her lead keeps increasing. If you are so inclined, you may feel free to join me in obsessively refreshing the vote totals page, located right here.

We’ll discuss all this plus the dramatic outser of Jeff Sessions on the podcast later today. For now, here’s all the news that’s not fit to ‘cast!

Art Imitates Life: The midterms saw a dramatic increase in women, people of color, LGBTQA folks,  and non-Christians running and eventually being elected to office. This is going to be the most diverse Congress ever seen in all of American history.

The New Yorker has given us a picture of the phenomenon that is worth far more than 1000 words. This week’s cover is a celebration of the new guard of elected representatives of the people of America. All the people. No matter who we are.

Welcome to Congress, friends. We’ve been waiting for you.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

An early look at next week’s cover, “Welcome to Congress,” by Barry Blitt. #TNYcovers

A post shared by The New Yorker (@newyorkermag) on

American Government For Dummies: The elections in Florida have crossed the threshold for automatic recounts, plus, as we know, the initial count is ongoing in Arizona. That means we have several race results still outstanding, while election workers do the foundational democratic task of counting all the votes and double checking them to make sure they were counted correctly.

You know and I know that this is not a scandal or a conspiracy or evidence of fraud. Donald Trump, Rick Scott and others within the Republican establishment do no seem to know this and they are getting very, very upset about it. Fortunately, we all have Dan Rather on the case to explain Election 101 to us all.

As you can see, this is an explainer so simple that anyone could understand it, even a President who can’t read anything longer that 280 character.s If one of you would be so kind as to tweet it to him, I would greatly appreciate it. I would do it myself but I’m still blocked.

WTF: Iconic design house Yves Saint Laurent has released a new line of jewelry right in time for the holidays. The gold toned ear-ring and pendant set fare priced at $345 for the earrings and $795 for the necklace. They feature…penises.

Like there aren’t enough dicks in all of our lives already.

The jewelry is anatomically correct, though the model may have been on the large side of the penis bell curve. Also, the penises appear to be circumsized, which will probably lead to the stupidest controversy ever when anti-circumcision activists get upset about over-priced fake penises not having foreskin.

Meanwhile, if you have always wanted to spend over a grand to pull off the world’s best Dick In A Box moment, here’s your chance.

That’s it for today, friends. Tune in when the new episode of the podcast drops tomorrow and Greg hands the Asshole Governor baton from John Kasich to Mike DeWine!

Hey Dems, Let’s Just Gerrymander States!

After some baffling election results 2016 and 2018 elections, I’d like to propose what should be the Democrats’ new version of gerrymandering: moving state borders to group like-minded, homogeneous groups of voters together.

I’d start by giving the annoying Florida Panhandle to Alabama and adding Atlanta to North Carolina, thereby fixing two problems once and for all. (See graphic.) It would make all four states more homogeneous and avoid the bifurcated cultures – and consistently infuriating election outcomes – that drive the citizens of those states (and the rest of the country) crazy.

I humbly call my plan “kevinmandering.” 

Please feel free to suggest your ideas for new, improved state borders and let’s make kevinmandering the next big political craze!

Kevin Kelton is a former Saturday Night Live writer and cohost of The More Perfect Union podcast.

Pop Goes The Political Culture, November 3

Election Day is November 6!

Hello, hello MPU-universe! We are officially in the last weekend before the election and if you’re like me, you’re busy doing some sort of Get Out The Vote action! Whether you are phonebanking, canvassing, texting, or planning to provide rides to the polls, you are AWESOME! Let’s make this election go down in history as having truly epic participation!

I’m also working with Greg, DJ, and Kevin on the rundown for the podcast which includes discussions about whether or not a president can alter the constitution via executive order (spoiler: no), what it means that the Pentagon is refusing the request to send troops to the border (spoiler: Mattis is better at his job than Trump is), and discussing if Trump has been secretly subpoenaed by Robert Mueller (spoiler: there have been no spoilers leaked).

For now, let’s dive into all the news that’s not fit to ‘cast!

HalloWTF: We just wrapped Halloween, and, as much as we could wish it were otherwise, that holiday cannot go by without an example of costumes of appallingly bad taste. This year is was a bunch of teachers (!?!!??!) who dressed as the border wall and the most racist depiction of Mexicans since Speedy Gonzalez.  Their district superintendent is now looking into the matter.

Costumes like that serve only to make other people feel bad or afraid. If I were Latino or Hispanic, I would feel distinctly unsafe sending my kids school with teachers who did that. It’s not just insensitive, it’s outright hostile.

For anyone saying “What? It’s a joke.” Yeah. It was a bad. mean joke. I’m not saying Halloween has to be serious and overly PC. I’m just saying Halloween shouldn’t be about being an asshole.

It is actually very easy to dress up for Halloween and NOT being wildly inappropriate. You just need to follow these simple rules:

  1. You may dress as a fictional character.
  2. You may dress as an animal or plant.
  3. You may only alter the color of your skin if you are altering it to a color that does not occur in humans (i.e. You may paint yourself green to look like Gamora in Infinity War. You may NOT paint yourself brown to look like T’Challa in Infinity War).
  4. Vintage Nixon masks are always funny.

If you follow those rules, you too can have all the fun on Halloween without making anyone else feel bad.

Deterrent Fail: Remember when some Republican flack was on tv in 2016 and said if we let immigration from South and Central America increase we’d have taco trucks on every corner? And all of Liberal Twitter was like “Taco truck? Tell me more.”

Well, former FoxNews personality and current Don Jr gal-pal Kimberly Guilfoyle has the latest not very threatening threat:

I can’t say the Star Wars cantina is my favorite sci-fi/fantasy hangout option – I’m more of a Leaky Caldron kind of girl – but it’s by no means a place I would shun. It definitely seems better than the cafe in Berlin where the young Nazi started belting out “Tomorrow Belongs to Me” in Cabaret, which seems to be what far-right America is after.

Countdown: As of this writing, there are only 13 days until the release of Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald. That is not political or even controversial. I’m just really excited to see this movie.

By the time I sit down to write next week’s column the election will be over and most of the results will be certified. Remember to vote.  And please vote for candidates who stand against racism, homophobia, transphobia and misogyny. Thank you.

Motivating Millennials

By Kevin Kelton

This Tuesday, Democrats need young voters to turn out in record midterm numbers. Yet news report after news report still tells us millennials just aren’t motivated enough to vote. “I’m too busy” or “Voting won’t make a difference” are among the array of excuses young people give when asked why they don’t plan to cast a ballot.

So let’s try a new tack. Instead of asking them to vote for their own self-interest, let’s appeal to their sense of friendship. The young people I know are incredibly loyal and compassionate to their friends and peers. They care deeply about gender rights, civil rights, fairness, and justice. Maybe appealing to the better angels of their nature can cajole a few to the polls.

Toward that end, I suggest you ask your voting-reticent kids and acquaintances to consider these people on Tuesday morning:

  • Think about your friends who are gay, trans or still finding their gender identity. Do you think it makes a difference to them which party controls congress for the next two years? Will it make a difference to them if there is no check on Trump stopping transgenders from serving in the military? Or from even being considered a real gender? Will it matter to your gay friends if they can be fired or legally discriminated against for the mere act of coming out? Does it make a difference to them if the can continue to get married, or if their current marriage is someday annulled by an act of congress abetted by an increasingly right wing judiciary?
  • Think about your black classmates. Will it make a difference to them if civil rights, voting rights and affirmative action laws are rolled back to the point of being meaningless? You don’t want to vote, but if you don’t vote, they may never get the chance. Republican state legislatures – again, abetted by conservative courts – are increasingly finding creative ways to stop blacks and Latinos from voting. The chance to vote may not mean all that much to you, and we understand. But will they understand if your lack of civic duty robs them of the chance to make their voices heard?
  • Think about your female friends. Will the #MeToo movement be stronger or weaker with a Republican congress? You may be right that both parties are tainted by corruption. But only one party painted Professor Christine Blasey Ford as a hysterical, opportunistic liar. Only one party wants to take away a woman’s right to choose. Only one party continues to fight against paid family leave, increasing the minimum wage (which is particularly helpful to young women and single mothers), and only one party continues to push abstinence as the only acceptable form of birth control. If you don’t want to stand in line for an hour to vote for your own rights, would you stand in line to protect your sister’s rights, or your mom’s, or your best friend’s?
  • Think about the kind man who cuts your parents’ grass or the kind woman who helped raise you and your siblings. It was always amusing that they could barely speak English, and you and your family had to communicate with them with your limited Spanish. Maybe he came here as a young boy; maybe she is a citizen because her parents immigrated here a few years before she was born. But they are good people who became your extended family and you could count on. What will it mean to them to live in an America where their citizenship can be taken away, or their parents or kids can be deported in an instance, suddenly disappearing with no trace? Would you stand in line to vote to help protect their children from suddenly being orphaned by an ICE raid? Is their entire future worth a half-hour of your time?
  • Think about your friends in college (or applying now) who will increasingly be saddled with crushing student debt. Would you take a half hour out of your Tuesday to vote for the party that stands for lower student loan rates, finite payback periods, and a return to the days of low-cost or even free public colleges? Is 30 minutes of your time worth tens of thousands of dollars to your younger brother or sister? Because in many ways that’s on the ballot, too.
  • Finally, think about another friend of yours: the future you. Think about the world you’ll be living in in 20 or 30 years. I know it’s crazy to think about far off things like Social Security and Medicare and pension plans. But do you want to spend your thirties and forties wearing surgical masks out in public, like they do in Beijing? Hooking up is hard enough. Imagine trying it with one of those on. Will you consider voting to protect your lungs and your future sex life? (Or the planet you plan to live on for the rest of your life?)

If you think it’s a waste of your time to go vote, next Tuesday, okay – maybe it is. But is it something you can do for someone else? You’d do almost anything for your best friend, your little brother, your big sister, your LGBT friends, and your minority classmates and work pals. If you’d do anything for them, can you do this?

Because, yeah, maybe it won’t make a difference. But, if enough young people like you think about their friends this Tuesday, maybe it will.

The outcome of the midterms may not mean anything to you, but it means everything to them. It’s 30 minutes, about the time it takes to get your car washed or wait for a pizza to arrive. Give that 30 minutes as a gift to your friends this Tuesday.

Do someone you love a small favor. Vote.

 

Kevin Kelton is the founder of Open Fire Politics and cohost of The More Perfect Union podcast.

 

Pop Goes The Political Culture, October 28, 2018

“Every now and then a madman’s bound to come along.

Doesn’t stop the story. Story’s pretty strong. Doesn’t change the song.”

– Stephen Sondheim, Assassins

It is Sunday in America and we are grieving for 11 souls lost to a mad gunman at Tree of Life synagogue in Pittsburgh. At the same time we are relieved and grateful that a would-be mass bomber was arrested in Florida on Friday, before he could inflict physical harm on others.

On Facebook yesterday, DJ posted this tweet:

This was my reply to the question:

In the case of a person so unbalanced that the idea of sending bombs via parcel post seems reasonable, no. A mind that damaged could twist any outside force into justification for enacting violent ideation. Remember Mark David Chapman was inspired to shoot John Lennon by The Catcher in the Rye.

But – BUT – the Trump style of hyperbolic and negative speech is what is driving more sane people to be awful in uncountable, tiny ways. He has given permission for regular folks to be their worst selves. They may never commit acts of physical violence but they are using words and small actions to hurt the people around them. His supporters’ everyday acts of hatred are a million paper cuts of harm to society.

For many years, I have been active in gun violence prevention advocacy. What I have learned from that work is that the mass shooter is not the real gun problem. The random act of extreme violence perpetrated by the profoundly damaged human being is not the problem we should focus on solving. Because that is not a systemic problem addressable by policy changes. The mass shooter, the bomber, that person is working at the behest of an internal force that would compel him or her to be violent regardless of outside stimuli. The problem of the deranged killer is the derangement, which is a condition that will demand manifestation and will settle on any excuse.

As I quoted above, “Every now and then a madman’s bound to come along.”

In gun violence prevention, the real problems are much simpler. Keeping guns locked away from children. Keeping guns away from domestic abusers. Keeping guns away from people with ideations of self-harm. The smaller, more everyday problems are less visible, but more solvable.

Similarly, in Trump’s America, the real problem – one that is foundational to our society, and probably most societies –  is not the crazed zealot determined to cause mayhem. It’s everyday community on community bigotry. It’s the sign in the window reading “No Irish Need Apply”. It’s the housing development with bylaws that exclude certain types of people from purchasing homes. It’s the separate drinking fountains and segregated schools. It’s the country club that won’t accept Jewish members. It’s the indigenous nations pressed into unwanted corners of the country by laws they had no voice in creating. It’s the baker who refuses orders from same-sex couples. It’s the school that denies the self-affirmed gender identity of trans students.

It is the us seeking to exclude a them.

We have all experienced the personal struggle to overcome us-versus-them thinking and accept new people into our personal circles. We have all overcome the fear of the unknown to reach out a hand to the stranger who looks truly strange to us. And we all understand that it bring us closer to being the kind of people we truly want to be.

We also know that it is hard work and it is probably against our evolutionary wiring. We wouldn’t be so quick to exclude if exclusion hadn’t been crucial to survival at some point in our ancient past. Being the better person isn’t easy and it is often a fight against our intrinsic natures.

What Trumpism has done is given people permission to stop having that fight and let their intrinsic natures win. He allows us to be our worst selves. He gathers his “us” close to him and tells the madding crowds that yes. Yes, they may openly disdain “them”.

Most of the people who have gratefully accepted his new rules for social commerce would never shoot up a synagogue. That’s not what we need to fear from them.

Instead, they would be the person huffing and griping in line at a grocery store because the person ahead of them is paying with an EBT card. They would be the one who yells at restaurant server with an accent to “Just learn English!”. They would change seats on public transit if a person of color sat beside them. And they would teach their children to do the same.

The top elected official in our country is a boorish, vulgar man. He is unkind and insensitive. He is a walking manifestation of our worst, most trollish impulses. For the people who share his prejudices, the opportunity emulate him and to stop trying to suppress those feelings is clearly seductive. They are happy to mirror the boorishness, the vulgarity, the unkindness, the insensitivity. They feel free to be their worst selves.

The greatest violence Trump has done is to the social compact we once had where we agreed to do unto others as we would have them do until us. The loss of that contract has made us a restive, anxious, and angry society for the moment. We are all bitter and sharp with one another. We are all struggling and no one is happy because, ultimately, acts of unkindness are unsatisfying and leave no joy in their wake.

We feel helpless in the face of the armed madman because he is unpredictable and his periodic emergence is probably inevitable. But we should not feel helpless in the face of small acts of cruelty because we have power over them. We can weigh our own words before we speak. We can stand at the side of the person receiving the cruelty and show ourselves as allies. We can confront others for their cruelty and ask that they stop. We can do that and we should do that. That is what the ideal of a peaceful society demands of us.

I have faith that we all still have access to our better selves and we can walk back from this shadow of cruelty that Trump has cast over us. All we have to do is remember who we wanted to be before a madman came along into the White House.

Pop Goes The Political Culture, Week of October 15, 2018

The 2018 election is November 6! Vote like democracy depends on it!

By Rebekah Kuschmider, MPU co-host

Hello, hello MPU-niverse! Remember how on the podcast last week we were lamenting how it had been a slow news week? Well, we won’t be having that problem again!

This week we saw the Saudi government say that a likely political assassination was actually a fistfight. Mitch McConnell announced his intention to cut Medicare, Social Security and repeal Obamacare if Republicans retain control after the midterms. And now Trump is saying the US will pull out of a Reagan-era missile treaty with Russia on the grounds that  Russia can’t “go out and do weapons [while] we’re not allowed to”.

That’s a real quote. I took it from the BBC. It’s not fake news. That’s how our foreign policy is being articulated in 2018.

We will scream into the void discuss all of this in detail when we convene to record the podcast this evening. For now, here’s all the news that’s not fit to ‘cast!

Viagra Nation: I’ve been on a kick of researching telemedicine options this week after seeing an ad for a telemed app specifically to distribute erectile dysfunction meds. The ad ran during a primetime baseball broadcast so it got an audience like whoa. It’s the same audience that watches all those Cialis bathtub ads every week. This app makes it possible to get the Cialis – albeit not the bathtubs – delivered to your door in discreet packaging after you have a virtual consult with a doc via the app.

Now, there is nothing at all wrong with this. Not a darn thing. It’s innovative and entrepreneurial and there is a slot in the market for it. No one, and I mean no one, is contesting this app.

The thing that is grinding my gears is that there is an equivalent app for people who want to get birth control or emergency contraception but it doesn’t have acceptance of the ED app. First of all, the network of doctors willing to participate in the birth control app is far lower than those willing to prescribe erectile dysfunction meds by mail: the birth control app works in 17 states, compared to 38 for the ED app. Second, the BC app IS getting pushback from conservative forces. There are people who erroneously believe that emergency contraception causes abortions and they don’t want the medication to be easily available.

As I wrote at Medium this week, these same people don’t have an issue with door-to-door boner pill delivery even though 100% of unwanted pregnancies are caused by sperm. Which come from boners. Just sayin’.

As for drugs that actually do induce abortions, getting those via telemed is…well, easier now than it was a week ago. Let me begin by saying that medical abortion (as opposed to surgical) is safe, effective, and recommended for terminating pregnancy before 10 weeks. That means they are 100% legal everywhere in the US. Science even defends prescribing them via telemed, an incredible convenience considering that many people don’t have easy access to gynecological services in their region. But the same people who hate emergency contraception have largely blocked US-based telemed distribution of medical abortion drugs.

Enter Women on the Web, an organization that has been offering global telemed distribution of medical abortion drugs for years. Or rather, don’t enter. Women on the Web has never before shipped to the US because our anti-abortion forces are so virulent that the organizers feared they would shut down their operation entirely rather than let US residents access legal, effective medication to end an unwanted pregnancy. Instead, the founder has created a spin-off operation called Aid Access just for women in the US. That way if American antis shut them down, only Americans are harmed. The rest of the world can carry on as usual.

So that’s the state of sex pills in the US. If you want a hard-on, you can probably get one delivered. If you want to avoid pregnancy, you can maybe get pills for that by app. If you want to end a pregnancy? Call a service outside the country.

Come on…Ted: The only good thing to come out of the Citizens United ruling is the trend of really awesome political ads sponsored by groups that don’t have to watch their language. This web ad from the PAC Fire Ted Cruz and directed by Richard Linklater is particularly amusing.

Speaking of the Midterms: There are only SIXTEEN DAYS until the 2018 election! Early voting is open in many states. Click here for a complete list if you want to find info for your state.

You also need to double check your polling location. Click here to check that info.

Finally, memorize this phrase in the event that you are denied access to the polls once you arrive:

 

There’s lots more coming on the podcast so look for the new episode tomorrow morning. Until then, have a nice weekend and go tell everyone you know to vote blue!

At War With Millennials

by Kevin Kelton

There are some 80 million millennials in the U.S. today, approximate 25% of the country and 31% of the voting-age population. And they seem angry. As I scan their posts in my Facebook political group, Open Fire, I invariably read sentiments like, “Your generation screwed it all up for us” and “Now we are left to clean up your mess.” This is especially true inside the Democratic party, where more liberal leaning young people eternally bitch and moan about their elders in the progressive movement.

If you are a Democrat over 50 – or worse, God forbid, a baby boomer – it can seem like we are at war with millennials. They blame us for supporting Hillary and her eventual loss to Trump. They blame us for climate change and the loss of the Supreme Court. They blame us for corporatism. They blame us for the sorry state of our politics.

But their self-righteous condemnation is misplaced. If millennials want to solve some problems, the first place they should look is a mirror. They represent almost a third of all potential voters, yet they turnout in historically poor numbers. If those 80 million potential voters – who skew heavily Democratic – voted in percentages more in line with older demographics, this nation would look vastly different than it does today. Only 49% of them bothered to vote in 2016, some 20 points lower than baby boomers. In a presidential election that was decided by a mere 77,000 votes, their lack of participation was clearly the difference.

And their midterm turnouts are even more miserable. Voters under 30 made up just 13% of the total votes cast in 2014 and 12% in 2010, about a third of the Boomer turnout. 

Yet the millennial generation takes no responsibility for their communal lack of civic passion and effort. It’s as if their friends’ indifference to their political future was somehow our fault.

Let’s look at the playing field. Did the generations that came before them make mistakes? Sure. Lots of them. But we also gave them the internet, smart phones, sixty years of relative peace and prosperity (with a few dark spots along the way), advances in medical science, cures for AIDS, eradicating Polio, reliable birth control, and a slowly improving social contract for minorities and LGBTs. Is it perfect? No. But is it progress? Undeniably.

As for education, we built the best public university systems known to mankind, with massive discounts for instate tuitions. Yet less than half of all college bound students take advantage of their own state’s universities and the associated in-state tuition. They would rather inherit tens of thousands of dollars in student debt to move across country than go to an equally fine college a few hundred miles away. Then they complain about the student debt we’ve saddled them with. In 2014, 10,230 New York high school grads left the state for pricier out-of-state schools, while California saw 17,196 of its graduates migrate elsewhere for college. Is it the baby boom’s fault a New York high school senior with a 3.8 GPA chooses USC over SUNY Stony Brook? I get that the winters are nicer in Los Angeles. But $150,000 nicer?

We also gave them online voter registration and “absentee” vote-by-mail, making their commitment to political change that much easier and convenient. Too much of a hassle to stand in line on election day? A pen, ten minutes and a stamp is all you need. (In some states, even the stamp is optional.)

The one thing we didn’t give them – and for that we should take responsibility – is a broad understanding of the electoral process. Radicalism (liberal and conservative) works fine in the streets, from the anti-war protests of the sixties to the Stonewall riots to the BLM and MeToo movements. But real political courage takes place by coming together for a common cause greater than your own ideological purity test. Would single-payer healthcare and free public colleges be nice? Sure. There are a lot of things about the Democratic Socialist movement that would probably be an improvement. But is it politically viable? No, and not even a Sanders-Warren administration will change that.

Because while it’s true that Americans as a whole lean liberal on most issues, the historically low levels of millennial voting participation has allowed our governing institutions to veer far right. Sadly, a mere 17% of our national population holds a majority representation in the U.S. Senate, and the equally disproportionate electoral college means a Democratic presidential candidate has to win several million more votes than her Republican opponent just to have a chance. With the highest court in the land now firmly ensconced in conservative hands for another generation or longer, it’s impossible to see a scenario where our representative democracy becomes more aligned with the progressive values of voters overall.

To stop from slipping further backwards, we need to band together as a party and hold the line on social rollbacks and corporate giveaways. Every seat in the House and Senate is ground we must hold until the presidency and its inherent levers of power are back in Democratic hands. There is no room for ideological purity tests on this current political battlefield, or for fragging our own. I personally will support any Democrat who gets nominated for any seat. My only litmus test is the D in their bracket. Ideological purity is a luxury for the party in power, not the one seeking it.

But enough finger pointing. I’m not here to beat up on millennials. I just ask that they stop beating up on me. We mostly share the goals of an improved healthcare system, lowering our environmental footprint, battling wealth inequity, showing compassion for minorities and the disadvantaged, and advancing civil and gender rights. Our prescriptions differ at the margins, but our ideals are in line.

So if we must be at war with millennials, let’s be at war together against the Trumpian conservative movement that is trashing American principles and values by the day. I want to be at war with millennials. But on the same side of the war. Brothers in arms. In a battle for the soul of a nation, not the soul of a political party.

 

Kevin Kelton is the founder of Open Fire Politics and cohost of The More Perfect Union podcast.

 

Pop Goes The Political Culture, Week of October 1, 2018

Hello, MPU-universe. Chances are you are reading this through a red scrim of rage that has suffused your vision ever since the FBI released it’s “report” this week and it became clear that the GOP was going to finalize the nomination process of Rapey McLiarson and put him on the Supreme Court. Then, to add insult to injury, Senator Collins decided to go on the Congressional record and talk about all the ways in which Democrats are mean and bad and, oh yeah, she doesn’t really believe Dr. Ford.

Hope that all the dark money rules Kavanaugh will uphold are worth it, Senator Collins. I mean, none of us will have SuperPACs helping us get and keep jobs but at least you get to have that.

Anyway, we’ll discuss all of this in excrutiating detail on the podcast, so for now, here’s all the news that’s not fit to ‘cast.

Founding Patriarchy: I don’t usually like to cite books I’ve haven’t finished reading but I’m going to make an exception here. (Yes, I know. I talk a lot about books. I like books, ok?) I’ve been slowly making my way through The Hemingses of Monticello: An American Family by Annette Gordon for a while. The story of the intertwining of the Hemings family, the Skelton family, and the Jefferson family is a stark illustration of everything that was wrong with the institution of chattel slavery in America.

One of the things that I learned from this book is that American slavery had a deliberate and well-considered structure. When the Virginia Company incorporated rules for the new colony under King James, it modeled most laws off the British code but made a few adjustments.

For example, in Britain, a child inherited its status from its father. Therefore, a baby born to an enslaved woman and a free man was automatically free.  The Virginians changed that up so that status was conferred matrilineally. Thus, a child born to an enslaved woman was also enslaved, regardless of paternity. That means, that Virginia slave owners could make new slaves just by impregnating the women they already “owned”.

That is all as profoundly disgusting as it sounds. Chattel slavery is already an abomination, then Virginias addeed to that permission to rape (because there is no consent in such a situation, let’s face it), and then force women to bear children they never asked for, over whom the man would then have complete dominion. IT IS SO FUCKED UP.

And the architect of our independence Thomas Jefferson, as well as all his slave-owning buddies, were all up in that mess. That’s who founded out country. They weren’t saints. They thought this was just and right.

It took hundreds of years, hundreds of lives, and gallons of blood sweat and tears to get from the point where TJ would “own” his offspring with Sally Hemmings – who was his dead wife’s half sister, BTW, and also her “property,  given as a “gift” by their mutual father  – to the point where a woman with a PhD in psychology could walk into the United States Senate and say “I demand to be heard” and then be heard.

She was heard imperfectly and the outcome was disappointing but, make no mistake, Dr. Ford and every person who lifted her up as she made her way to the halls of power, walked away with a handful of gravel pulled from structure of white, male supremacy in America. She didn’t win but she will be written in history as one of the millions of people who helped to destabilize the patriarchy.

The fight is not yet over. But we have come so far from where it all began that we cannot stop now.

Speaking of History: A couple of my friends posted this wonderful essay that Howard Zinn originally published in 2005.You should read it. It’s entirely relevant and resonant today. He was talking about the confirmations of Justices Roberts and Alito and the despair the left felt over those.

The whole essay is a reminder that changes doesn’t come from the top. Change in America is a grassroots effort. We are at our most successful when the least among us walk in lockstep to march toward a single socially just goal. As Zinn puts it:

Our culture–the media, the educational system–tries to crowd out of our political consciousness everything except who will be elected President and who will be on the Supreme Court, as if these are the most important decisions we make. They are not. They deflect us from the most important job citizens have, which is to bring democracy alive by organizing, protesting, engaging in acts of civil disobedience that shake up the system.

Or, in more Hollywood terms, we have the evergreen line from Aaron Sorkin’s The American President: ” America isn’t easy. America is advanced citizenship. You gotta want it bad, ’cause it’s gonna put up a fight.”

The part of America that is the final reflection of the white, landed patriarchy is grasping to retain its power. That is undeniable. However, it is within our power to stop it. It won’t be easy. We’ll need to throw some tea into the harbor. We’ll need to flip a lot of state legislatures. But we can do this.

Remember that America is us, not the Court, not the Congress, and not the Constitution.

As Margaret Mead said “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has.’

Is Raising the Minimum Wage Really Progressive? Why I Say No.

by D.J. McGuire

Amazon’s announcement that it will pay all its employee no less than $15 per hour (with a call for the rest of American businesses to do the same) has added fuel to the flames of the minimum wage debate. As usual, I find myself at odds with nearly every other Democrat on the matter. The main thrust behind this is the assertion that the low-paid are being cheated by their employers, and thus the employers must bear the brunt of fixing the problem by paying higher wages. There is also a Keynesian macroeconomic argument that endorses transferring income to the lower paid as a way to stimulate aggregate demand. The former argument is simply wrong, while the latter is merely misguided. In fact, I would argue that income supports (like the Earned Income Tax Credit) are more efficient and equitable than a minimum wage hike.

For starters we have to remember how wages are set in a competitive marketplace. Labor demand is what economists call “derived demand” – in that it is derived from the expected revenue the firm can expect from its workers. Higher prices and higher production mean higher wages. In other words, what truly drives wage rates in competitive markets are the customers (i.e., us). So, first and foremost, this is our fault. Secondly, while the emphasis of the minimum wage debate has been on large firms like Amazon and Walmart, a very large portion of firms affected are small businesses (including franchisees, which are small businesses in corporate garb).

Meanwhile, the economic impacts of a minimum wage hike are both damaging and avoidable. Firms will respond by either cutting production (and laying off staff), increasing automation (also laying off staff), or raising prices; the most likely outcome across the economy is a combination of the three. So employment will fall and prices will rise. In effect, for consumers, a minimum wage is a hidden sales tax – and a sales tax is one of the more regressive types of tax out there (i.e., it hits the poor the most). Remember this the next time some wealthy pundit (yes, Bill Maher, I am looking at you) complains about “paying for welfare” of low-paid workers; their solution is that poorer Americans pay for it instead. This goes double for folks in the IT industry, which sees demand for their products rise as more firms switch to automation. In that context, the actions of Amazon – whose largest profit center, by far, is Amazon Web Services (cloud services) – take a much more self-interested hue. Moreover, a higher minimum wage benefits not just the working poor but also the working young (many of whom are not poor at all) and is thus inefficient.

By contrast, a negative income tax (of which the Earned Income Tax Credit is a kind) avoids all of the negative effects of a minimum wage increase, while being more equitably funded (via governments, whose reliance on income taxes ensures a less regressive impact).  Moreover, to call it “welfare” is to deny the fact that income taxes (as labelled) are not the only taxes out there. The low-paid also pay taxes on gasoline, food, shelter (via property taxes either paid directly if they own property or via higher rents from taxed landlords), and nearly everything else with a sales tax. They also still pay taxes on income (don’t forget the payroll tax). Additionally, a larger EITC would have the same macroeconomic effect on aggregate demand without the inflationary effect of higher prices.

To be fair, there are some who argue that a minimum wage hike won’t reduce employment. They focus upon markets that are less competitive – and thus, where firms have enough market power to separate wage rates from derived demand. However, I think those markets, while more likely to get our attention, are fewer than most realize. More to the point, they can be more efficiently addressed by reforming antitrust law to take into account the effects of monopolies and oligopolies on resource markets (such as labor) rather than just product markets.

Most progressive (perhaps all of them) consider minimum wage hikes to be in line with their values. Policies, however, are about methods, too. I would humbly submit that expanding the EITC and addressing gaps in antitrust law would be a more efficient and more equitable set policies to help the American working poor.

D.J. McGuire – a self-described progressive conservative – has been part of the More Perfect Union Podcast since 2015

Pop Goes The Politial Culture, Week of September 24, 2018

Actual photo of 2018

Oh, hi there, MPU-universe. Hang on a second. I’m just trying to put out this dumpster fire over here but it just keeps burning.

This week has been truly amazing. We saw a Supreme Court nominee yell at all the Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee but no one asked him if he thought he could rule fairly on cases involve Democrats considering his open animosity toward them (Spoiler: I bet he can’t). We saw Trump declare to the world that he and Kim Jong Un are in love. And we saw Kate McKinnon steal the entire SNL cold open with her impression of Senator Lindsay Graham.

Other people will try to say Matt Damon was really the funny one on SNL and he was but let’s be real. For everything else that is wrong with America today, at least we can all know that we live in the same moment in time as Kate McKinnon.

We’ll get to all of this and more when we record later today, but for now, here’s all the news that’s not fit to ‘cast!

We Need Diverse Books: As many of you know, I am a reader. I read the way most people watch tv: for hours a day as my primary source of entertainment. This is not an indication of intellectual prowess; I just prefer book to tv because books are quieter. The books I read often involve a grisly murder and an intrepid investigator who is probably harboring an inappropriate love interest while also solving crime. It’s genre fiction, not great literature.

My resolution for 2018 was to read more books by authors of color. I felt like this should be an easily achievable goal and, to a certain extent, it is. There are a lot of really amazing books by authors of color on the market at any given moment. These are books that deal with untold episodes of history and explore the cultural role of under represented peoples. They are Important Literature.

But as we established, I don’t always want to read Important Literature. I want a murder and an intrepid investigator and all that. And I’m not the only one. Mysteries and thrillers often top the best seller lists. But they’re often by white people! And the intrepid investigators are white! Sometimes you find characters of color making guest appearances in the book but they aren’t the prime focus.

Look, I know damn well there are smart women of color writing mysteries and thrillers and chick lit and other kind of genre lit. But I have to go hunting through the internet begging for recommendations for authors of color. Meanwhile, Goodreads and Amazon send me lists of white authors right to my inbox every day.

It’s time for more diversity in publishing. ALL of publishing, not just literary fiction and cultural criticism. Genre fiction needs more diversity as well.

Get on that, publishers.

P.S. If you want to know exactly what I’m reading, I’m on Goodreads. Let’s talk books!

Book Club: Speaking of books, I had a book club meeting this past Friday. We read Praise Song for the Butterflies by Bernice McFadden, which was excellent, by the way. (And she is an author of color!) But when women gather in 2018, we help each other to cope however we can. This week? I brought cake.

 

We didn’t even cut slices. We just went at it with forks, Tina Fey style.

You gotta do what you can to survive, these days and what I needed was angry cake.

Check Your Breasts: Finally, October is Breast Cancer Awareness Month. That means you’ll see pink ribbons clashing with Halloween decorations everywhere you go. It’s a cultural happening. But it’s also a serious health issue and one that any human being with breast tissue is at risk of contracting.

The American Cancer Society has guidelines for early detection of breast cancer. Check them out and work with your doctor to figure out what our risk factors are and what types of exams you need. Cancer screenings are covered without co-pay as a matter of law under the ACA so your clinical exam or mammogram won’t have any out of pocket fees if you have insurance. If you don’t, look into the Breast And Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program through the CDC. That can help you get the care you need even without insurance.

That’s all from me this week, folks. Tune in to The More Perfect Union podcast when it drops on Monday!

Pop Goes The Political Culture, Week of September 17, 2018

Actual selfie of Rebekah whenever she reads about people excusing Brett Kavanaugh.

by Rebekah Kuschmider, MPU-cohost

Welcome back, MPU-inverse. How are you? I’m exhausted.

I would like just one week in 2018 to last an actual week. It seems like weeks this year have all lasted about a century and a half. They are all jam-packed with headlines that would make Jerry Springer go “Nah, man. That sounds too fake. Can’t sell it.”

But it’s not fake! It’s all happening! We really do have a Supreme Court nominee being questioned about his role in a sexual assault. Rod Rosenstein really was saying stuff – maybe joking, maybe not – about the president being unfit to serve. There really are going to billions of tariffs on Chinese goods right before the holidays! IT’S ALL REAL!

We’ll talk about all this and more on the podcast for for now, let’s check the lighter side of the world. Here’s all the news that’s not fit to ‘cast.

Be Less Crazy: This week has a lot of women losing their damn minds as we discuss the validity of sexual assault allegations and what constitutes valid enough. It feels like women are screaming “Just treat them all as valid and investigate them all and don’t pick us to pieces!” and large swaths of men are saying “Yeah, ok, but how do we know bitches don’t just be cray?”

If you are getting defensive and want to say “That’s not what men are saying, Rebekah, what we mean is…” Just stop. Stop thinking and keep reading. This next part is for you.

Feminism has been a powerful movement. Women have worked for centuries to make sure that the women who come next have it just a bit better than they did. And it’s worked. Women in America today have it better than women in America have ever had it.

It’s better not because women have gotten better. It’s better because men have gotten less crazy.

Let me explain. In a fantastic interview in 2014, Chris Rock – who is a fucking oracle for our time – summed up the state of progress for black people by saying this:

“There are no race relations. White people were crazy. Now they’re not as crazy. To say that black people have made progress would be to say they deserve what happened to them before…So, to say Obama is progress is saying that he’s the first black person that is qualified to be president. That’s not black progress. That’s white progress. There’s been black people qualified to be president for hundreds of years. If you saw Tina Turner and Ike having a lovely breakfast over there, would you say their relationship’s improved? Some people would. But a smart person would go, “Oh, he stopped punching her in the face.” It’s not up to her. Ike and Tina Turner’s relationship has nothing to do with Tina Turner. Nothing. It just doesn’t. The question is, you know, my kids are smart, educated, beautiful, polite children. There have been smart, educated, beautiful, polite black children for hundreds of years. The advantage that my children have is that my children are encountering the nicest white people that America has ever produced. Let’s hope America keeps producing nicer white people.”

The same is absolutely true for women. It’s not that women have changed; it’s that men have gotten less crazy.

But I’m here to say that some of you are still kinda crazy and you have to stop. Just stop. If you’re the guy saying “Well, why didn’t she report it at the time”, if you’re the guy saying “He was a teenager”, if you’re the guy trying minimize the emotional wallop of seeing an sexual assailant being seriously considered for the Supreme Court, this just 2 years after an alleged sexual predator was elected president, you are still too crazy. You are still making it harder for women.

This is true if you are a woman or non-binary too. If you are in any way making excuses for Brett Kavanaugh, you are still too crazy.

Listen, I’m a grown up and I can handle the IV drip of rage I feel when I see people being deliberate obstacles to the progress of others. I grew up on it. But my daughter is six years old. She hasn’t been handed a plateful of rage yet and my job as her feminist mother is too reduce the helping of rage she’ll have to digest in her lifetime. Maybe I can’t give her a life of unadulterated joy but I’ll be damned if she has to be as angry as I am. As my mother was. As all the feminists before her have had to be.

So for the sake of the girls and kids of color and LGBTQA kids all coming up: be less crazy.

Wolfpack: If you’re depressed and/or angry about the previous section of this column, it’s ok. I am, too. Fortunately, we live in a  time when Abby Wambach gives kickass graduation speeches as women’s colleges and we can watch them online. I strongly encourage you to watch her right now and then throw away your own red riding hood. It’s time to be the wolf you were always meant to be.

That’s all I’ve got this week, folks. Be less crazy and be like a wolf. Maybe that will make everything all better. Meanwhile, tune in to The More Perfect Union Podcast when it drops on Monday!